Greetings!
Price Doesn’t Equate To Cost!
I just talked to a client who had
very competitive prices on his surgical mesh, but I also made him
aware that his price to cost ratio per procedure on
this same product line was
2,617:1
or a $57,837.32 missed
opportunity.
This was just one of 29
occurrences that we identified in which this client’s excellent
prices didn’t equate to outstanding savings for his
hospital. I’m happy to report that it didn’t take this client more
than a New York minute to realize that he needed to dedicate
more time investigating his utilization cost, rather than his
pricing.
Based on our studies, it’s rare
for us to find a healthcare organization that isn’t obtaining the
best prices for the products, services and technology that they are
purchasing. On the other hand, we have never found a
hospital, system or IDN at which prices equated favorably
to their cost.
Isn’t it time we all start
giving equal time to reducing our in-use cost of the
commodities we purchase as opposed to only putting the
spotlight on our price savings?
Your Partner
in Supply Chain Savings,
Robert T.
Yokl
President &
Chief Value Strategist
P.S.
By the way,
have you listened to our new
Podcast
“Strategic Dashboards: Why Do You Need Them?” This
Podcast will give you real
examples of how your colleagues are deploying these dashboards to
make their life easier.

Click here to learn more about strategic dashboards
Technology Value Analysis Teams:
Big Dollars, Big Savings And Big Results!

“Most
Healthcare Organizations Aren’t Really Value Justifying Their
Technology Purchasing, Because They Think What They Are Doing Is
Good Enough”
The average hospital spends $4,
$12 or even $24 million annually on technology capital
expenditures for new software, hardware, laboratory, surgery,
monitoring, cardiology, radiation and imaging equipment (or
whatever) just to stay competitive in the community they serve. Yet,
with all this activity, most healthcare organizations in their
rush to stay competitive, aren’t really value justifying
their technology purchases because they think what they are doing to
approve these expenditures is good enough.
Good
Enough Isn’t Good Enough Any Longer!
With rare exception, healthcare
organizations have limited financial resources to invest in
new technology purchases. So every dollar saved on these investments
can stretch your capital dollars by as much as threefold.
These savings aren’t going
to happen, however, if healthcare organizations continue to employ
tired, defective and outdated capital expenditure approval processes
to value justify their new technology purchases. This
happens when their department heads rush to get their capital
expenditures identified, priced, prioritized and documented so that
they can be included in the capital budget for any given year.
Then, after the hospital’s
executive management team has pruned the capital expenditures
to an acceptable dollar threshold, maybe these capital expenditures
will be reviewed by a capital equipment committee. I have
been told by CEOs, CFOs and COOs on these committees that they
don’t really know what they are approving -- but do so
anyway!
Does this sound like a
scientific, methodical, systematic and foolproof
money-saving process to you?
Technology Value Teams Are The Answer!
It’s been our clients’ experience
that if they slow down their capital expenditure approval
process and add one more step, a Technology Value Analysis Team
(cross-functional team trained in functional analysis), to value
justify their capital expenditures -- 26% more dollars
can be saved – before the bidding even begins. At a hospital with a
$12 million dollar capital budget this savings equates to
$3.1 million in savings.
It just gets
better!
Our clients have found that
18% of the capital expenditures on any given year -- that
were more often than not approved in prior years -- weren’t
needed at all. Often a lower cost alternative was found by their
Technology Value Team to meet the functions that their customers
were looking for but didn’t have the time, resources or
wherewithal to investigate.
It all comes down to this. If you,
in fact, want to value justify your new technology
expenditures you need the time, talent, resources and advanced
value analysis processes to do so. This can be best
accomplished by establishing a Technology Value Team that places
every capital expenditure under a microscope to insure
that your healthcare organization is receiving the “best” value for
your limited capital expenditure dollars.
To do less than this is tantamount
to throwing away millions of dollars annually that could
increase your capital budget by 1, 2 or even 3 fold.

Click here to view the scorecard